Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods for Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce
نویسندگان
چکیده
The objective of this thesis is to develop appropriate methods and tools to deal with decision making problems arising in business-to-business electronic commerce. In this context, we propose MCDM methods for the problem of supplier selection and the problem of customer evaluation for order acceptance aiming to tackle effectively and efficiently issues of complexity and uncertainty which are inherent in the respective decision processes. Regarding supplier selection, we present a novel evaluation method with two stages. A satisficing technique is used in the first stage of this method for the prequalification of the suppliers. The final evaluation of suppliers is performed in the second stage through the use of a fuzzy AHP technique. As far as customer evaluation is concerned, we present a novel class of methods extending TOPSIS. On the one hand, the proposed class of methods tackles the issue of uncertainty of the decision maker preferences through the use of linguistic variables and their representation as fuzzy numbers. On the other hand, the proposed class of methods may be parameterized according to the behavioral pattern of the decision maker towards risk. Moreover, a simulation experiment is designed and executed in order to analyze and study the proposed class of methods. The results of the simulation experiment show that it is adequate to distinguish three instances of the proposed class of methods that correspond respectively to risk-averse decision makers, to risk-neutral decision makers, and to risk-seeking decision makers. Finally, we present a novel agent-based DSS architecture for flexible electronic marketplaces. This architecture is employed for the implementation of a Decision Support System incorporating an application for supplier selection which is based on the proposed decision method.
منابع مشابه
A Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Location Selection in the Niger Delta Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach
Making an informed decision with regards to a suitable business location or site selection for organizations is becoming challenging for business decision makers globally; and even more challenging in business environment that are saddled with uncertainties. The continues raise of multiple criteria variation of site preferences has also necessitated the application of advanced decision making t...
متن کاملMulti Agent based Hybrid E-negotiation System in E-commerce
E-business negotiation is a decision-making process that seeks to find an electronic agreement, which will satisfy the requirements of two or more parties in presence of limited information, and conflicting preferences. Therefore, we need to use hybrid systems that are able to have an appropriate performance in real conditions of different types of automated negotiations. This paper presents a ...
متن کاملAn Entrepreneurial Decision-Making Model: A Case Study of the Electronic Business of Tehran
E-businesses play a critical role in today's knowledge-based economies. Despite their increasing portion, e-businesses experience high rates of failure. Therefore, it is of prime importance to identify their decision-making activities encountering outer competitive forces and their internal structural events. In this study, through using the Grounded Theory approach, we analyze interviews c...
متن کاملComparing performance of organization on implementation of customer relationship management systems using ANP and TOPSIS hybrid approach
As the customers are the main reason of the formation and survival of the organization, not only understanding their obvious needs, but also forecasting, determining and guiding their hidden needs, design and implementing plans of offering services for meeting these needs for attracting customers are among cornerstone of any activity in the organization. In this research, one compares the perfo...
متن کاملEvaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach
The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...
متن کامل